fix: Flash-Mutex beim Boot statt im kritischen Abschnitt anlegen

src/app_main.c

@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ static void app_task(void *arg)
     uint32_t boot_ms, beat_seen;
 
     (void)arg;
+    nl_flash_init();
     nl_resetcnt_init(base + NL_FL_RESETCNT);
     boots = nl_resetcnt_boot();
     nl_settings_init(base + NL_FL_SETTINGS_A, base + NL_FL_SETTINGS_B);

src/config/nl_flash.h

@@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
 
 #define NL_FLASH_SECTOR_SIZE 4096u
 
+/* Must be called once before any other nl_flash_* call, before other tasks start. */
+void nl_flash_init(void);
+
 /* All functions return 0 on success, < 0 on error. Addresses are absolute. */
 int nl_flash_read(uint32_t addr, void *buf, uint32_t len);
 /* The target bytes must be erased (0xFF); the stores never rely on implicit erases. */

src/config/nl_flash_w600.c

@@ -10,33 +10,30 @@
  * fls_lock (see sdk/Platform/Drivers/internalflash/wm_internal_fls.c). The app task
  * (periodic nl_state_log_append) and the console task (nl_app_save_settings,
  * nl_app_factory_reset) can therefore issue concurrent SPI transactions and corrupt
- * each other. Serialise all flash accesses with our own mutex, created lazily on
- * first use so no caller has to be changed.
+ * each other. Serialise all flash accesses with our own mutex.
+ *
+ * The mutex is created once in nl_flash_init(), called as the very first statement
+ * of app_task() before any other task can touch flash - not lazily from inside a
+ * critical section, since tls_os_mutex_create() allocates and can block, which must
+ * not happen with interrupts disabled. If nl_flash_init() was forgotten (s_flash_lock
+ * still NULL), the accessors fall through unlocked rather than crash.
  */
 static tls_os_mutex_t *s_flash_lock;
 
-static tls_os_mutex_t *nl_flash_lock(void)
+void nl_flash_init(void)
 {
-    u32 cpu_sr;
-    tls_os_mutex_t *lock;
-
-    cpu_sr = tls_os_set_critical();
-    if (s_flash_lock == NULL)
-        tls_os_mutex_create(0, &s_flash_lock);
-    lock = s_flash_lock;
-    tls_os_release_critical(cpu_sr);
-
-    return lock;
+    tls_os_mutex_create(0, &s_flash_lock);
 }
 
 int nl_flash_read(uint32_t addr, void *buf, uint32_t len)
 {
-    tls_os_mutex_t *lock = nl_flash_lock();
     int r;
 
-    tls_os_mutex_acquire(lock, 0);
+    if (s_flash_lock)
+        tls_os_mutex_acquire(s_flash_lock, 0);
     r = tls_fls_read(addr, (u8 *)buf, len) == TLS_FLS_STATUS_OK ? 0 : -1;
-    tls_os_mutex_release(lock);
+    if (s_flash_lock)
+        tls_os_mutex_release(s_flash_lock);
 
     return r;
 }
@@ -44,28 +41,29 @@ int nl_flash_read(uint32_t addr, void *buf, uint32_t len)
 int nl_flash_write(uint32_t addr, const void *buf, uint32_t len)
 {
     /* tls_fls_write only erases when the target is not 0xFF; the stores always write erased areas. */
-    tls_os_mutex_t *lock = nl_flash_lock();
     int r;
 
-    tls_os_mutex_acquire(lock, 0);
+    if (s_flash_lock)
+        tls_os_mutex_acquire(s_flash_lock, 0);
     r = tls_fls_write(addr, (u8 *)buf, len) == TLS_FLS_STATUS_OK ? 0 : -1;
-    tls_os_mutex_release(lock);
+    if (s_flash_lock)
+        tls_os_mutex_release(s_flash_lock);
 
     return r;
 }
 
 int nl_flash_erase_sector(uint32_t addr)
 {
-    tls_os_mutex_t *lock;
     int r;
 
     if (addr % NL_FLASH_SECTOR_SIZE)
         return -1;
 
-    lock = nl_flash_lock();
-    tls_os_mutex_acquire(lock, 0);
+    if (s_flash_lock)
+        tls_os_mutex_acquire(s_flash_lock, 0);
     r = tls_fls_erase(addr / INSIDE_FLS_SECTOR_SIZE) == TLS_FLS_STATUS_OK ? 0 : -1;
-    tls_os_mutex_release(lock);
+    if (s_flash_lock)
+        tls_os_mutex_release(s_flash_lock);
 
     return r;
 }